Mercury Problem Worse Than Suspected

Mercury contamination of your home

It now appears that a broken CFL at home is actually more cause for worry than previously thought.

After the now infamous (and cited ad nauseam) accident in Maine, the Maine DEP had its own science team test how much mercury is actually left in a room after breaking a CFL on floors with and without carpets, which resulted in revised cleanup recommendations:

Revised Cleanup Guidance
Maine Compact Fluorescent Lamp Breakage Study (the original report)
Mercury in CFLs – special investigation (long and scary reading, including summary of the Maine Report + interviews & addintional info collected by Invesitate Magazine TV, New Zeeland)
New Electric Politics: The mercury issue (shorter summary of the summary)

Some quotes from the Investigate Magazine summary [my emphases]:

“First off, the often-cited claim that bulbs contain only 5mg of mercury was clarified: it’s an average. (..) The average amount of mercury in a CFL is 5 mg with a range of 0.9 to 18 mg. Obviously, the smaller (in watts) the bulb, the less mercury. Higher power (brighter) bulbs generally have more, although there can be fluctuations between brands as well.”

“‘Mercury concentration in the study room air often exceeds the Maine Ambient Air Guideline (MAAG) of 300 nanograms per cubic meter (ng/m3) for some period of time, with short excursions over 25,000 ng/m3, sometimes over 50,000 ng/m3, and possibly over 100,000 ng/m3 from the breakage of a single compact fluorescent lamp,’ the report confirms.

That’s up to 300 times higher than the recommended safe level of inhalable mercury vapour. From just one light bulb. According to the DEP scientific study, while the 300 ng/m3 limit is the maximum allowable daily dose of mercury for the sake of legislation, there is in fact no known safe level for mercury exposure.”

“To put the exposure in perspective, a study of workers who had been exposed on a regular basis to 33,000 nanograms/m3 of mercury (roughly a third of the 100,000 ng/m3 peak caused by a broken bulb), and compared in a neurological test to a control group of 70 unexposed people, found they scored worse on ‘mental arithmetic, 2-digit search, switching attention, visual choice reaction time and finger tapping’.”

‘Sensitive populations are of particular concern with mercury exposures for a number of reasons.’ ‘Elderly and unhealthy individuals may already be at comprised health and be more susceptible to mercury effects than a healthy individual. For example, mercury does kidney damage which could exacerbate an already existing kidney disease’.

‘Infants and toddlers have much more vulnerable brains.’ ‘Mercury exposures have serious impacts on fetal and infant brain development. Elemental mercury can cross the placenta from a mother to fetus.’ ‘It is well established that the developing organism may be much more sensitive than the adult to neurotoxic agents,’ reports Maine’s DEP study. ‘For example, methylmercury exposure can produce devastating effects in the fetus, including cerebral palsy, blindness, deafness, and even death, while producing no or minimal effects in the mother‘.

“The report also noted that following official clean-up guidelines was still not good enough to eliminate the pollution.

‘Although following the pre-study cleanup guidance produces visibly clean flooring surfaces for both wood and carpets (shag and short nap), all types of flooring surfaces tested can retain mercury sources even when visibly clean. Flooring surfaces, once visibly clean, can emit mercury immediately at the source that can be greater than 50,000 ng/m3. Flooring surfaces that still contain mercury sources emit more mercury when agitated than when not agitated. This mercury source in the carpeting has particular significance for children rolling around on a floor, babies crawling, or non mobile infants placed on the floor’.

“[T]he scientists note that the mercury contamination was considerably worse – nearly double in fact – at summertime temperatures (32C) than winter (23C).”

“Additionally (and this is why carpets have to be destroyed), the scientific team repeatedly vacuumed carpets where bulbs had broken, to see if vacuuming did eliminate the residue. They found that even after several attempts, the mercury was still trapped in the carpet fibres. To make matters worse, some of the vacuum cleaners were so contaminated that cleaning them was impossible, meaning not only was the carpet over and out, so was the vacuum cleaner.”

‘If clothing or bedding materials come in direct contact with broken glass or mercury-containing powder from inside the bulb that may stick to the fabric, the clothing or bedding should be thrown away,’ warns the US EPA.

“Maine state government now officially recommends that:

‘…homeowners consider not utilizing fluorescent lamps in situations where they could easily be broken, in bedrooms used by infants, small children or pregnant women, or over carpets in rooms frequented by infants, small children or pregnant women.’

“Then there’s the problem of what to do with the toxic waste. Surprisingly, plastic jars, like large peanut butter containers with screw top lids were little better than plastic bags, also failing to prevent mercury vapour from leaking into the house. The best method of containing bulb waste is inside a glass jar with a hermetically sealed lid.”

Brandy Bridges: ‘They’re not as eco-friendly as we’d like to think. Just the fact that they’re being shipped in trucks and who knows how many cases get dropped? You’re in your local hardware store, and they’re broken on the floor, and you’re walking by unknowing that there’s mercury there, that people are just walking by and breathing in, and a lot of people don’t have a clue’.”

“Perhaps the most dangerous aspect to the CFL mercury issue, however, is not the instant ‘spike’ exposure caused by a breakage, but the effect of a string of breakages over the years on the toxicity of suburban homes. Picture a low income family (…) forced to use CFLs because of the light bulb ban and because they cannot afford even more expensive halogens. Picture a breakage, then try and estimate the odds of a stressed out (or drugged up) householder following proper clean-up and disposal procedures.

“Then picture a few more breakages over the years, none of them dealt with properly. Then try and figure out how much mercury might accumulate in the carpets, floorboards and walls of such a house over a 20 year span. Then try and figure out the impact such poisoning might have on every family that moves through that house, and how many taxpayer dollars might be wasted dealing with the health or crime problems that erupt downstream because of mercury exposure.

“When you buy a house or move into a rental, you won’t know whether the home you’re moving into is contaminated by mercury, unless you go to the extreme expense of getting it tested. Your safety, and your family’s safety, will rely on the ability and willingness of other ordinary [citizens] to properly dispose of mercury laden light bulbs, and you’ll never really know. The real cost is not one light bulb breakage, but how badly affected homes will be after 20 years of amateur attempts to clean up one of the deadliest neurotoxins on the planet. A generation of children crawling on mercury-infested carpets would give new meaning to the phrase, “dumbed-down”.

“On the strength of these scenarios alone, there’s a good case for actually banning the use of CFLs in homes, outright and immediately.”

I couldn’t agree more. And I don’t see how any responsible politician or environmental organisation could either, after getting this new information.

——–

Edit Feb 2013: The reports on mercury-poisoned workers in China moved to: CFL Analysis – Mercury

 

Advertisements

8 Comments

  1. Panta Rei said,

    September 17, 2009 at 7:21 pm

    Yes, CFL mercury is a much bigger problem compared to power station mercury releasehttp://www.ceolas.net/#li198xOf course this is not unrecognized,particularly in a practically emission-free country like Sweden.But then the talk is of "solidarity"with Germany etc, ignoring that Germans can and will deal directly to lower the emissions anywayin line with overall EU mercury policy(which is basically "let's get rid of all mercury.. except in CFLs"!)Interesting about the mercury drip filling as reported by VITO – that organisation being what the European Commission likes to refer towhen it suits them,and being behind the current eup4light.net research for the Commission:http://www.eup4light.net/default.asp?WebpageId=34Finally, there is a lot more attention post-EU ban to the mercury situation, also in the USA.Unfortunately, often with "ban when LEDs are ready", "buy LEDs instead" recommendations:Understandable,but it should be remembered that the ban is wrong in itself for many other reasonshttp://www.ceolas.net/#li1xonwards

  2. Halogenica said,

    September 17, 2009 at 11:10 pm

    Right. The only lamps for which a ban would make sense, would be the high pressure mercury street lamp + CFLs for private use.

  3. RIUM+ said,

    November 6, 2009 at 7:05 am

    This is assuming all CFLs are broken and their mercury content dumped into the environment… I'd be interested to see what the ratio of returned-for-recycling-unbroken vs thrown-in-the-bin-or-broken CFLs is.

  4. Halogenica said,

    November 6, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    Recycling rates vary between countries. Some countries have efficient recycling schemes, others have none. For EU, I've posted the available statistics in an earlier post: https://greenwashinglamps.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/recycling/

  5. philipwyatt said,

    May 28, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    Hi,
    We do a similar service over here in the UK. Everything is now recyled including the glass and the mercury! Domestic customers can just take them down the local dump. We will then pick them up in bulk for the recyling plant, but for businesses we have to supply a service!
    Feel free to check my site out at http://fluorescentlamp.wordpress.com
    Leave a comment and link if you wish. Thanks

  6. September 2, 2012 at 7:29 pm

    […] See also my earlier post: Mercury Problem Worse Than Suspected […]

  7. September 2, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    […] See also my earlier post: Mercury Problem Worse Than Suspected […]

  8. December 21, 2012 at 1:22 am

    […] mercury vapour. Increased mercury mining in China due to rising demands from the West is causing an environmental disaster in Asia! CFLs  may also emit carcerogenic chemical and UV radiation (through cracks in the phosphor […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: